Great Design Thinkers: Tim Brown on Design Thinking
By Andrew Wilshere
This is the first in a new series of articles on contemporary design thinkers. We begin with Tim Brown, who is CEO and President of IDEO, a global design and innovation firm founded in 1991. He is best known for his work advancing user-centered design—and in particular for developing the idea of “design thinking”.
Tim Brown identifies engineer Isambard Kingdom Brunel (1806-1859) as one of the first design thinkers: Brown opens his book Change By Design with an account of his time as chief engineer of the Great Western Railway in England. Design thinking emerged as a concept with a name back in the 1960s, but it was IDEO co-founder David Kelley who brought the idea into the mainstream of business and innovation.
Brown has worked at IDEO since the firm was founded, and in that time he has written extensively on design thinking. Although he still hasn’t settled on a firm definition of a “design thinker”, in a well known article for Harvard Business Review in 2008, he set out what he sees as their most distinctive qualities:
- Empathy: design thinkers readily identify with the perspectives of colleagues, clients, end users, and customers. They use this insight to create desirable solutions, and fulfil product needs that even the user didn’t know they had.
- Integrative thinking: design thinkers are able to grasp all aspects of a complex problem. By negotiating between conflicting ideas about the right way forward, they can develop a better solution. They integrate the best elements of those different ideas.
- Optimism: design thinkers believe that there is always a potential, as yet unrealized, solution that is better than what already exists.
- Experimentation: design thinkers imagine radical change rather than trying to make incremental improvements. By doing this they drive innovation.
- Collaboration: design thinkers readily work with others, particularly those from different disciplines. Often they themselves have significant training and experience in several fields.
Design thinking isn’t just for designers
In the same article, he characterised design thinking as “a methodology that imbues the full spectrum of innovation activities with a human-centered design ethos. […] Innovation is powered by a thorough understanding, through direct observation, of what people want and need in their lives and what they like or dislike about the way particular products are made, packaged, marketed, sold, and supported”.
With this in mind, one of the important things about Brown’s conception of design thinking is that it’s not just for designers. It’s an approach for understanding problems and developing solutions, and this is required in many jobs—whether you’re any administrator, engineer, or even a medic. Design thinking gives us a deeper description of a problem, enabling us to prototype a range of potential solutions rapidly, and identify the right solution robustly.
Embarrassment, judgement and self-editing
Hopefully, your fellow designer will follow the Love Sandwich guidelines and give you a great, honest critique. During a critique, It’s important that when you hear the good and the bad feedback to take it with stride. Design isn’t math. There are no right and wrong answers; only subjective opinions that may differ from one designer to another.
That being said, remember that a critique is about your work and making it the best it can be; it shouldn’t be about you. If you disagree with specific feedback, explain your decisions thoughtfully but also listen to what’s being said. Remember, those who are giving critiques generally do so because they want to help you grow as a designer, so try not to get defensive or take their criticisms personally.
And, if you don’t agree with specific comments you receive during a critique, it’s okay to ask for other opinions, too. Baltimore is filled with great designers who are willing to help and who love to give a good critique. There are also online resources like Dribbble or Behance that you can log into and share your work with others around the globe. Anyone, even a non-designer friend or coworker whom you trust to give honest and constructive feedback, can be a good resource. And, a good round of feedback is always better than no feedback at all
First, he gives audience members 30 seconds to draw the person next to them. Afterwards, he notes that lots of people’s first instinct is to say sorry: expressing both immediate, unreflective, and negative judgements towards their own work; but also showing a fear of the judgement of others. As a result, most of us end up pursuing work and proposing ideas that minimise the risk of judgement, rather than work that expands what’s possible.
Second, he provides the audience with a piece of paper with 30 circles on, and gives them 1 minute to transform each of those 30 circles into something different (like the sun, or a football). You can try the exercise now, if you like, by printing out the image below, and using the stopwatch app on your phone. Go!
If you tried it yourself, how many circles did you transform within the time?
The exercise shows that most people are conditioned to prioritise quality over quantity, even when they’ve been told explicitly that the aim of the exercise is to fill the page. The chances are that you came up with some ideas that you immediately, almost unconsciously, decided not to pursue. This might have been because you felt they were too simple, too off-the-wall, or too similar to another idea you’d already used.
And yet one of the ideas we dismiss, or prevent ourselves from even thinking about in the first place, could be just the answer we need.
Design thinking in action
In Change By Design, Brown goes into detail about some of the design thinking projects that he’s been involved with at IDEO. One of these projects was with the SSM DePaul Health Center in Saint Louis, which approached the company for insights that could help inform the design of a new hospital wing.
Wanting to understand the experience of a patient at the hospital, an ethnographer on IDEO’s team, Kristian Simsarian, pretended to have a foot injury and presented at the Emergency Room. In line with the “empathy” principle of design thinking, the team thought that the best way to gain understanding was literally to put themselves in the patient’s shoes.
Some of Simsarian’s observations were obvious and immediate:
- The check-in process was disorientating and opaque
- It was frustrating to be asked to wait, but not being told what he was waiting for or why
- Being wheeled around by a stranger through nondescript, unfamiliar corridors created anxiety about what was happening
He also wore a concealed camera, allowing the project team to conduct deeper analysis afterwards. By watching this footage, more opportunities for improvement were identified:
- The tedium of the hospital environment reflected the overall opacity of the experience of being in hospital
- The lookalike hallways and bland waiting areas would be key to the story the hospital wanted to tell in its expansion project
- There were competing narratives about the “patient journey”: the hospital viewed this as being about “insurance verification, medical prioritization, and bed allocation”, while the patient experienced it as “a stressful situation made worse” by the hospital’s environment and processes.
From this analysis, the team concluded that the hospital needed to explore design solutions that would restore the balance between its legitimate interest in medical and administrative tasks, and “the human side of the equation”.
Brown explains that by taking a user-centered, design thinking approach to the patient experience, the team were able to spot not only the physical issues with the hospital, but also the “latent needs” of patients. Latent needs are those that the user might not be able to articulate clearly themselves, and that they might even be unaware of having. By identifying them, it is easier to come up with ideas for improvement.
Design thinking has become an important part of service design in hospitals, as providers try to improve patient experience and service satisfaction. For example, This Is Design Thinking reports a case study of a recent project to improve the patient experience at the Rotterdam Eye Hospital.
The “Madlove” project in the UK has also recently explored a user-led process for designing a psychiatric hospital. Speaking to Creative Review in April last year, artist and former patient James Leadbitter described how those living in psychiatric wards still need “access to nature, […] the senses being stimulated. Our current model is about deadening them.”
Tim Brown in his own wordsThere are a series of behaviors that we’ve learnt as kids, and that turn out to be quite useful to us as designers. They include exploration, which is about going for quantity; building, and thinking with your hands; and role-play, where acting it out helps us both to have more empathy for the situations in which we’re designing, and to create services and experiences that are seamless and authentic. (Source: TED)
- Read Tim Brown’s full bio, which also has an extensive list of his articles on design thinking
- We explore another of his ideas—the T-shaped person
- The Harvard Business Review article is available via IDEO
- Another TED talk: “Designers: Think Big!”
- Get his book Change By Design
- Read strategy+business’s in-depth Thought Leader interview
- Fastco have a great article on the founder of IDEO, David Kelley, with some more case studies of design thinking in action
Andrew Wilshere Designlab Designer, Writer, and Mentor